Why I Am a Democrat – Pt. 1

This is a re-post from a few years back. I now plan on writing a part two (and getting back on the blgging train) so here you go:

In this post (and perhaps subsequent posts as this one is getting long already) I will outline some of the reasoning behind why I’m still a Democrat and how I reconcile that with being a Christian. Why do I want to do this? Well it’s my long held belief that some of my brethren on the Right have branded Christianity as the official Republican religion. I won’t go so far as to say that they have highjacked the faith, but they have certainly cast aspersions on anyone that claims to be simultaneously a Christian and a Democrat.

A long, long time ago I found myself a young man sitting in my college dorm. There was a presidential election coming up and I needed to register to vote. I had made it through two years of college blissfully ignorant of anything outside my own sphere of influence (little larger than a hamster ball), but even I knew that I had a responsibility to vote for the leader of our country if for no one else. I knew almost nothing concrete about platforms or even why I needed to register with a certain party. At the time I figured I had two choices and based on my limited knowledge, I chose the Democratic Party. Of course I realize now that my options were somewhat broader, but we’re dealing with me then, not me now.

I did know that my politics, such as they were, lined up with the liberal side of things. I believed very much in the freedom of choice in all things. I was strongly pro-choice on the abortion issue. I believed that the government had the responsibility to take care of those who couldn’t take care of themselves. My mother and I, in addition to other family members, had been the recipient of government help in the past. Affirmative action sounded pretty good to me as did equal rights for women, homosexuals, and every human being that drew breath.

Now at this point in my walk of faith I was little more than a yearling, literally. I had been baptized the year before. I’d always believed in a god of some sort and was raised in a nominally Christian household, but church going and Bible reading had never been a huge part of who I was. If you had asked me then about any of the basic tenets of the faith you would have gotten an opinion to be sure, but it would have been as shaky as any statement I’d make on anything other than literature or role playing games (my whole world at the time). So I do think that my fuzzy faith informed my fuzzy politics or perhaps vice versa; all of this coming out of my somewhat insular and naïve, though good intentioned, worldview.

As I’ve gotten older my political and religious beliefs have developed considerably. I consider myself to be moderate when it comes to both. Some I suppose would say that that means I’m still a bit fuzzy. To them I say, the more extreme your beliefs in either of these fields of human endeavor are the less good you are likely to do for anyone or any group. I think history will back me up on this point. As my views have changed, my faith has always been the basis for how I view the world and interact with it. I think that that’s a natural enough thing for any religious person. I for one don’t trust a politician who says that their faith doesn’t “interfere” with their political calling.

So presently I am still a Democrat and still a Christian. Now here comes the fun part (I know you were waiting). I’ll pick a couple of issues and tell you why I think I’m on solid ground with this choice. You feel free to agree or tell me why I’m a nut case.

Welfare/Social Programs – This has long been a bone of contention between my wife and me. Oh, time for a sidebar. For those of you that don’t know, my wife is a VERY conservative Republican and Christian. This has led to many fights, debates, sleepless nights, accusations, recriminations, and as a result of that a fair amount of makeup whoopee. So that’s all good. I think that the Bible is crystal clear on the need for taking care of those less fortunate than we are. This includes but is not limited to orphans and widows. We are to love our neighbors as ourselves and do unto others as we would have them do unto us. All well and good but why does this mean that we have to do that as a country? Isn’t that a personal thing? Of course it is. I think that it is also a corporate thing. Christianity calls for the Church to help others out, not just the individuals.

Large bodies of folks are almost always able to do more good than individuals (at least financially). The larger than body gets the more likely it is that certain things need to be mandated and codified. In our country, especially the early days, the Church has often done just that and still does to varying degrees. Unfortunately, or perhaps very fortunately, we don’t have a state church to take care of those sorts of things as a centralized function. So it falls to the State itself to perform that function for the people and by the people (that sounds pretty good). If this is, as some claim, a Christian nation then its values and actions should reflect that. Even if it’s only Christian in the sense that the majority of Americans claim to be Christian (which is what I believe that means). So for me the idea of our country having a wide variety of programs supported by our tax dollars to help out those that can’t help themselves is pretty much a no-brainer.

Now I know what some of you are saying. These programs are abused, misused, mismanaged, can be a bottomless money pit, etc. I hear that. That’s no reason not to try. Reform is needed, rejection is not.

Well this has gotten kind of long, so I’ll go ahead and close for now. I’d love to hear from the Republicans in the audience. Tell me where I’m wrong, or where I’m right, but how the Democratic party isn’t the one to help take care of folks.

  • http://twitter.com/thesciphishow Jason Rennie

    I guess the only question I have on social programs is, why do you hate poor people so much and wish to see them mired in poverty? That doens't seem like a very Godly attitude.

    Plus, I don't really see how _outsourcing_ your caring for the poor to an institution that raises all its money at the point of a gun is taking seriously the requirment to care for widows and orphans. Quite the opposite, it seems you are shirking your obligation rather than fulfilling it.

    And if you are still pro-choice, I think the only god from the bible you will find you worship is Molech not Yahweh.

  • spiritualtramp

    Well obviously I hate them because they're poor. I want to fatten them up on cheap government food so that we can then eat them.

    Cheers,
    The Molech worshiping host of this blog.

  • http://twitter.com/thesciphishow Jason Rennie

    Well at least you are honest I guess.

    But it was a serious question. Based on the _results_ of government attempts to “help” the poor, it is perfectly reasonable to conclude that the people instituting such plans must really really hate these poor people and take great pleasure from making them suffer, because that is what their schemes produce in abundance, and “by their fruit ye shall know them”.

    Also, i'm glad you are honest about the deity you worship.

    Jason

  • http://twitter.com/JadedDAVe DAVe

    From what I've read about God. He has always allowed us the freedom of choice. Consequences for our choices but pro-choice still.

  • http://twitter.com/thesciphishow Jason Rennie

    I'm pretty sure you'll find God takes a dim view of child sacrifice, even when you make that blood offering at an altar you call “choice”.

  • http://www.spiritualtramp.com/blog/2010/12/why-i-am-a-democrat-pt-2/ Spiritual Tramp » Why I Am a Democrat – Pt. 2

    [...] a part two to this series of posts and it was handed to me on a silver platter by a commenter in part one. Abortion and homosexuality are hot button issues when it comes to politics and [...]

  • http://thethinkingsaint.com/ A.P. Sullivan

    I'm afraid he doesn't allow for choices in any sort of libertarian free-will way. If God exists the way he's understood in Western monotheism, that kind of free-will is impossible. That kind of free-will is impossible anyway, but that's for another discussion.
    God, as he is presented in the Od and new Testaments, does not simply allow for free decisions to be made and then we suffer or enjoy the consequences. There are things that are morally forbidden, and there are things that are forbidden by God's will, that is, he intervenes and prevents things from happening. Read Exodus 20, and then read Romans 9. Some things are morally forbidden, and some things are sovereignly prevented.

  • footballshirts

    Hello,I read all of your articles in a day, please keep on writing and go to Replica Soccer Jerseys Man Utd Jerseys Soccer  Man
    Utd Soccer Jersey and Soccer Jerseys Wholesale wholesale FIFA 2010 world cup Spain
    Football Shirts and Cheap
    England Football Shirts England Football Teams Shirt Bayern
    Munchen Football Club Kit