Little Baby Jesus

talladega-nights-the-ballad-of-ricky-bobby-poster-0.jpg So I saw Talladega Nights on the tube the other night. I like Will Ferrel (in tee-iny doses) and this was one of his funnier ones imo. That’s not so much the point of this post though. At one point his character Ricky Bobby (a spot on parody of a Nascar driver) was saying grace with his smokin’ hot wife and his sons Walker and Texas Ranger and this is what he said:

Dear Lord baby Jesus, lyin’ there in your ghost manger, just lookin’ at your Baby Einstein developmental videos, learnin’ ’bout shapes and colors. I would like to thank you for bringin’ me and my mama together, and also that my kids no longer sound like retarded gang-bangers.

and

Dear Eight Pound, Six Ounce, Newborn Baby Jesus, don’t even know a word yet, just a little infant, so cuddly, but still omnipotent. We’d just like to thank you for all the races I’ve won and the $21.2 million, LOVE THAT MONEY! That I have accrued over this past season. Also due to a binding endorsement contract that stipulates I mention PowerAde at each grace, I just wanna say that PowerAde is delicious and it cools you off on a hot summer day and we look forward to PowerAde’s release of mystic mountain blueberry. Thank you, for all your power and your grace, Dear Baby God, Amen

This goes on for a bit and his wife finally points out that Jesus grew up. To which Ricky says that he likes the Baby Jesus best. That leads to some equally funny lines from his partner Cal about how he envisions Jesus and of course by this point you should probably just rent the movie if you even cracked a smile. Anyway, not the point.

The point of this post is I think that we all are guilty of picking the Jesus we like. Heck even those who may not be Christians have their own way of thinking about Jesus, “Oh he was a really good man.” or “Jesus was a great moral teacher.”. The last one just gets me in a funny place because he was actually teaching things that ran somewhat contrary to the moral teachings of his day.

There are those Christians that have painted Jesus as some sort of Modern Macho Man. Then there’s the sheep carrying, soft blue eyed girly Jesus. I’ve even seen a sort of Black Power Jesus. He may have had a kung fu grip, I’m not sure.

All of these different aspects ignore the whole picture of Jesus as a man, as God, as the union of the two that is perhaps the greatest mystery of Christianity. Sadly, part of that is because not even the gospels give us the whole picture of Jesus as a man. That’s because that’s not the point of the gospels anyway, but it would have been nice.

In spite of the fact that we don’t have a more complete picture though, I would encourage you not to cherry pick your particular Jesus icon. Jesus was (and is) incredibly complex and he was many things; teacher, carpenter, son, the God-man, butt-kicker, lover of all mankind. This month as we celebrate one tiny aspect of the person of the Christ, remember that no matter how well you think you understand him and who he was or was not don’t stop seeking him.

  • http://swanshadow.com/weblog.html SwanShadow

    Funny coincidence, Scott — my article for the church bulletin this week starts with the same Talledega Nights analogy.

    GMTA!

  • http://kansasbob.com Kansas Bob

    I love how CS Lewis put it in Mere Christianity:
    A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said [about Himself] would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon, or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come away with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.

  • http://sidfaiwu.com/blog sidfaiwu

    “Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse.”

    I quoted the very same line in a post I wrote that discusses that part of the book in length.

    In short it’s a false trilemma.

  • Scott

    Ahhh but I deconstructed your post. It really is pretty much one of the three, provided that is that a) Christ existed AND b) made those claims.

  • http://sidfaiwu.com/blog sidfaiwu

    b), at the very least is in serious question, though. Also, you didn’t successfully eliminate one of the most likely possibilities, that Jesus was honestly mistaken.

  • Scott

    It is open to question you’re right.
    Again if he was mistaken we’d call him crazy. Wouldn’t we? I would.

  • http://sidfaiwu.com/blog sidfaiwu

    You would, I would, but his followers would not. Consider that Jesus Maranda guy who claims to be god, or the numerous cult leaders throughout history who did the same. Their followers believed. Now transport such a person into a time when fact-checking and literacy were rare. If his followers are persuasive enough and worked hard enough, they could establish a self-perpetuating following.
    While that may seem improbable, but consider how that pattern worked for Scientology. Also, him actually being god seems even more improbable to me.

  • http://swanshadow.com/weblog.html SwanShadow

    Funny coincidence, Scott — my article for the church bulletin this week starts with the same Talledega Nights analogy.
    GMTA!

  • Scott

    @ Swanshadow – That’s awesome!
    @ Sid – Okay I see what you’re saying. If someone convinced him, if he was naive enough to believe it given the IMMENSE stigma claiming godhood would have in Judaic society, then I suppose that’s a valid forth option.