Rules For Good Writing - digg this
George Orwell laid out the following rules concerning how to better use the English language for expressing thought (ht to pickthebrain):
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
The essay that it comes from "Politics and the English Lanuage", written in 1946, also contains some eerily familiar thoughts on political speeches.
In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not true, it will generally be found that the writer is some kind of rebel, expressing his private opinions and not a ‘party line’. Orthodoxy, of whatever colour, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style. The political dialects to be found in pamphlets, leading articles, manifestos, White papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, of course, vary from party to party, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, vivid, homemade turn of speech. When one watches some tired hack on the platform mechanically repeating the familiar phrases — bestial, atrocities, iron heel, bloodstained tyranny, free peoples of the world, stand shoulder to shoulder — one often has a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy: a feeling which suddenly becomes stronger at moments when the light catches the speaker's spectacles and turns them into blank discs which seem to have no eyes behind them. And this is not altogether fanciful. A speaker who uses that kind of phraseology has gone some distance toward turning himself into a machine. The appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is not involved, as it would be if he were choosing his words for himself. If the speech he is making is one that he is accustomed to make over and over again, he may be almost unconscious of what he is saying, as one is when one utters the responses in church. And this reduced state of consciousness, if not indispensable, is at any rate favourable to political conformity.
It's amazing and perhaps a bit saddening that these words are as meaningful to me today, watching politicians spend all night speaking and managing to say nothing, as they where all those decades ago. I don't usually wax political in this forum, but I thought that these words were worthy to consider deeply, not only for me as a writer, but for anyone who is listening to what our "leaders" are saying.
Anyway, back to the list. One is difficult for me when writing anything, particularly fiction. Cliches seem to leap from my lips and pen unbidden. I've been working on number four for quite some time and I'm beginning to think that I have it licked. Of course as soon as you have that thought you know you're in trouble. So what about you?













Total Number of Comments: 2
political speechs certainly can be the worst...spending way too long to say way too little.
Yup. ;-)